Home / Case Studies / Canberra Administrative Law Practice (anonymised)
Case study

Canberra Admin Law Firm Halves ART Appeal Preparation Time

5 lawyers
Canberra, ACT
Administrative Law
Migration Law
Social Security
The outcome

A 5-lawyer Canberra administrative law practice uses Quillio to prepare appeals to the Administrative Review Tribunal (ART, formerly AAT). Across 80+ matters — spanning NDIS, Centrelink, and Part 5 migration review — the firm cut appeal preparation time by 55% while improving the quality of the s37 agency documents analysis.

Run the same pilot — free trial
The challenge

What they were trying to solve

Commonwealth agency decision-making under the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act (now the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024) generates dense s37 document bundles — often 300-800 pages per matter. The firm's lawyers were spending entire days indexing and cross-referencing these bundles before they could draft the statement of facts, issues and contentions.

The solution

Why Quillio

Quillio ingests the s37 bundle, produces a chronological index, flags the legal issues against the relevant legislation (NDIS Act 2013, Social Security Act 1991, Migration Act 1958), and drafts the statement of facts, issues and contentions. The lawyer reviews the flags and refines the legal argument.

Implementation

The firm ran a 4-matter trial across NDIS, Centrelink, and migration appeals before rolling out. Each lawyer calibrated Quillio's output against their own prior work on similar matters.

Results

Measurable outcomes

16h → 7h
Appeal preparation time

Average across NDIS, Centrelink, and Part 5 migration review matters

6h → 25m
s37 bundle indexing

Chronological index with issue-by-issue cross-referencing

+70%
Matters per lawyer per month

Capacity increased without additional hires

2 weeks → 4 days
Client advice turnaround

From receiving the s37 bundle to first-draft advice

"
"Our work is all about reading agency decisions and the evidence behind them. Quillio does the first pass of that reading — which lets me spend my time on where the decision went wrong, which is the part that actually matters."
Hugh B.
Principal · Canberra Administrative Law Practice (anonymised)
In their day

How it works in practice

ART appeal preparation across NDIS, Centrelink, and migration review matters; s37 document bundle analysis; statement of facts, issues and contentions drafting.

What they avoided

Capping intake of NDIS and Centrelink matters that pay at grant rates, or hiring a paralegal that the pipeline could not reliably sustain.

Questions

Case study FAQs

Has Quillio been updated for the ART transition from the AAT?

Yes. Quillio is trained weekly on Commonwealth legislation including the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024, and the ART practice directions as they are published.

Does it cover migration Part 5 review specifically?

Yes — including protection visa, partner visa, and character cancellation review under the Migration Act 1958 and the Migration Regulations 1994.

What about Legal Aid grant work?

The firm does a significant portion of NDIS and migration work on Legal Aid grants. The time savings have made this work more financially viable at the fixed grant rate.

Is client data shared with the Commonwealth?

No. Quillio runs on Australian-hosted infrastructure with no connection to Commonwealth agency systems. Matter data stays in the firm's practice management system.

Does it help with procedural fairness arguments?

Yes — Quillio flags where the agency decision may have breached procedural fairness requirements and drafts the relevant contentions for the lawyer to refine.

Run the same pilot.

Administrative law practices handling ART appeals should trial Quillio on one current s37 bundle. Start a free trial.

Start your free trial