Can Quillio draft submissions to tribunals?
Yes. I draft submissions to Australian civil and administrative tribunals — VCAT, NCAT, QCAT, SAT, SACAT, TasCAT, ACAT, and the ART — in each tribunal's house format. I produce the statement of facts, the issues, the legal framework, the argument, and the orders sought, grounded in that tribunal's case law.
Tribunal-specific format
Each tribunal has its own preferred format for submissions. I use the actual format the tribunal expects — for example, VCAT planning submissions follow a different structure from NCAT consumer claims, and ART migration submissions follow yet another. I do not produce a generic template.
Tribunal case law
Tribunal submissions rely on the tribunal's own decisions, not on general court authority. I pull the leading decisions from that tribunal on the issues you raise, and I flag where the current position is settled versus contested.
Length and tone
Most tribunals want submissions that are short and practical. I draft concisely and avoid the elaborate legal argument that would be appropriate in a superior court. Where you want a longer argument I can expand, but the default is tight.
Step-by-step
- Tell me the tribunal. Which tribunal, which list or division, and which side you represent.
- Upload the decision under review and evidence. If it is a review, upload the decision. Otherwise upload the key evidence.
- Describe the issues and your client's position. I use this to frame the submissions.
- Review and file. I return draft submissions in the tribunal's format. Review, polish, and file.
Common issues
- Some tribunals have strict page limits — I respect them if you tell me the limit
- Planning submissions must address the grounds of review — I use your grounds, not generic ones
- Consumer tribunals prefer plain English — I write accordingly
Try Quillio on a real matter.
The fastest way to know if Quillio fits your practice is to use it on your own work. The free trial requires no credit card and no sales call.
Start your free trial