Administrative Law prompts for Australian lawyers
These prompts are designed for AU administrative law practitioners handling judicial review, merits review (ART/AAT and state tribunals), FOI, and government decision-making challenges. Copy any prompt, replace placeholders with your matter facts, and run it.
A curated library of 25 AI prompts for Australian administrative lawyers. Each prompt is grounded in the ADJR Act, Judiciary Act section 39B, and current Federal Court and tribunal authority. Use them with Quillio for judicial review, merits review, and FOI work.
Research prompts (5)
Research jurisdictional error grounds
Research the current categories of jurisdictional error following Kirk, Hossain, and recent High Court authority. Cover materiality and recent Federal Court applications.
Research procedural fairness content
Research the current content of the procedural fairness obligation in [decision type]. Cover the hearing rule, the bias rule, and the recent authority on adverse information.
Research Wednesbury unreasonableness
Research the current Australian approach to Wednesbury unreasonableness following Li. Cover the standard of review and recent Full Court authority.
Research relevant/irrelevant considerations
Research the current approach to mandatory and irrelevant considerations as a ground of judicial review. Cite recent authority on the standard.
Research standing to seek judicial review
Research the current test for standing to seek judicial review under the ADJR Act and section 39B of the Judiciary Act. Cover recent authority on special interest.
Drafting prompts (5)
Draft an application for judicial review
Draft an application for judicial review under the ADJR Act. Applicant: [details]. Decision: [details]. Grounds: [list]. Include the declaration/orders sought.
Draft a statement of facts and contentions
Draft a statement of facts and contentions for a merits review in the [ART/state tribunal]. Issues: [details]. Structure with each issue, the evidence, and submissions.
Draft an FOI application
Draft a freedom of information application to [agency]. Documents sought: [details]. Include the relevant legal provisions and any public interest considerations.
Draft reasons for a delegate decision
Draft a statement of reasons for a delegate decision refusing [benefit/licence/approval]. Facts: [details]. Ensure compliance with section 25D of the Acts Interpretation Act.
Draft submissions for an internal review
Draft submissions for internal review of a government decision. Decision: [details]. Grounds: [details]. Keep submissions focused on the decision-maker's criteria.
Review prompts (5)
Review a statement of reasons
Review this statement of reasons for adequacy under section 25D of the Acts Interpretation Act. Identify any gaps that could ground judicial review.
Review an FOI decision
Review this FOI decision. Identify whether the claimed exemptions are properly made out and whether there are grounds for internal or OAIC review.
Review tribunal reasons
Review these tribunal reasons for errors of law. Identify any jurisdictional errors, constructive failure to exercise jurisdiction, or material procedural unfairness.
Review a regulator decision
Review this regulator decision for judicial review prospects. Identify the grounds, the supporting evidence, and the likelihood of success.
Review a notice of intention
Review this notice of intention to [cancel/refuse]. Check procedural fairness compliance, the adequacy of reasons, and the evidentiary basis.
Client comms prompts (5)
Explain judicial review
Draft a plain-English explanation of judicial review for a client considering challenging a government decision. Cover grounds, remedies, and limitations.
Explain merits review
Draft a plain-English explanation of the merits review process in [tribunal]. Cover timeframes, evidence, hearings, and outcomes.
Explain FOI rights
Draft a plain-English explanation of FOI rights and the process to obtain government documents, including exemptions and fees.
Explain procedural fairness
Draft a plain-English explanation of procedural fairness, including the hearing rule and bias rule, for a client facing an agency decision.
Explain available remedies
Draft a plain-English letter explaining the remedies available in administrative law, including quashing, declaration, injunction, and remittal.
Strategy prompts (5)
Strategy for judicial review
Develop a strategy for judicial review of [decision]. Consider the grounds, evidentiary constraints, standing, time limits, and prospects.
Strategy for merits review in the ART
Develop a strategy for merits review of [decision] in the ART. Consider fresh evidence, framing, and decision-maker tendencies.
Strategy for FOI access
Develop a strategy for obtaining government documents through FOI. Target: [details]. Consider the scope, exemptions, and review pathways.
Strategy for engaging with a regulator
Develop a strategy for engaging with a regulator during an investigation. Facts: [details]. Consider cooperation, legal professional privilege, and natural justice.
Strategy for challenging delegated legislation
Develop a strategy for challenging the validity of delegated legislation. Instrument: [details]. Consider ultra vires, unreasonableness, and procedural defects.
Run these prompts grounded in AU law
Quillio is built for Australian administrative law practice — every output is grounded in the ADJR Act, Judiciary Act, and current Federal Court authority. See /practice-areas/administrative-lawyers for details, or start a free trial at /free-trial to use these prompts on your own matters.
These prompts are templates — always verify outputs against source material and current legislation before relying on them in client matters.
Run these prompts on your own matters.
The free trial requires no credit card and no sales call. Sign up, paste any prompt, and see what comes back — grounded in current AU/NZ legal authority with clickable citations.
Start your free trial