Planning & Environmental Law prompts for Australian lawyers
These prompts are designed for AU planning lawyers acting on DAs, SSD/SSI, LEC appeals, compulsory acquisition, environmental enforcement, and heritage. Copy any prompt, replace placeholders with your matter facts, and run it.
A curated library of 25 AI prompts for Australian planning and environmental practitioners. Each prompt is grounded in state planning legislation (EP&A Act, Planning and Environment Act), Land and Environment Court practice, and current authority.
Research prompts (5)
Research SSD assessment pathway
Research the current SSD assessment pathway under Division 4.7 of the EP&A Act 1979 (NSW), including the Minister's powers and DPIE assessment.
Research s 34 conciliation outcomes
Research the recent trends in s 34 LEC conciliation outcomes for Class 1 appeals, including common agreed conditions.
Research compulsory acquisition just terms
Research the heads of compensation under s 55 of the Just Terms Act (NSW) and equivalent state legislation, including disturbance.
Research biodiversity offset requirements
Research the current biodiversity offset scheme requirements under the BC Act 2016 (NSW) and the BAM methodology.
Research heritage listing objections
Research the process for objecting to heritage listings under the Heritage Act [state], including interim heritage orders.
Drafting prompts (5)
Draft a Class 1 appeal notice
Draft a notice of appeal in Class 1 of the LEC jurisdiction against refusal of a DA. Applicant: [details]. Grounds: [details].
Draft an SSD application
Draft the supporting submissions for an SSD application under cl 4.39 EP&A Act. Project: [details]. Address SEARs and public interest.
Draft a submission on a public exhibition
Draft a submission objecting to / supporting a planning proposal during public exhibition. Issues: [details].
Draft a compulsory acquisition claim
Draft a compensation claim under the Just Terms Act. Owner: [details]. Land: [details]. Include market value, disturbance, and solatium.
Draft a s 34 statement of issues
Draft a statement of issues for a LEC s 34 conciliation. DA: [details]. Council position: [details]. Applicant position: [details].
Review prompts (5)
Review a development consent
Review this development consent. Identify deferred commencement conditions, modification pathways, and ongoing compliance obligations.
Review a SEPP interpretation
Review this development proposal against the applicable SEPP (e.g. Housing SEPP, Infrastructure SEPP).
Review a heritage impact statement
Review this heritage impact statement for adequacy against NSW Heritage guidelines and council requirements.
Review a biodiversity assessment report
Review this biodiversity development assessment report (BDAR) for compliance with the BAM.
Review a voluntary planning agreement
Review this voluntary planning agreement (VPA). Identify contribution, timing, and enforcement provisions.
Client comms prompts (5)
Explain the LEC appeal process
Draft a plain-English briefing for a client on LEC Class 1 appeal process and typical timeframes.
Explain compulsory acquisition rights
Draft a plain-English explanation of dispossessed owner rights under the Just Terms Act.
Explain SSD process
Draft a plain-English briefing on the SSD process, including SEARs, EIS, and determination authority.
Explain heritage obligations
Draft a plain-English briefing for a heritage property owner on approval and works obligations.
Explain modification pathways
Draft a plain-English explanation of s 4.55 and s 4.56 modifications to a development consent.
Strategy prompts (5)
Strategy for a Class 1 appeal
Develop a strategy for a Class 1 DA appeal. Facts: [details]. Consider s 34 conciliation, expert evidence, and amended plans.
Strategy for a Class 4 enforcement defence
Develop a defence strategy for a Class 4 enforcement proceeding. Facts: [details]. Consider rectification, BCRs, and civil penalty exposure.
Strategy for compulsory acquisition negotiation
Develop a negotiation strategy for a compulsory acquisition claim. Consider market value evidence and disturbance quantification.
Strategy for a planning proposal
Develop a strategy for advancing a planning proposal through gateway and exhibition.
Strategy for a VPA negotiation
Develop a strategy for negotiating a VPA with council. Consider nexus, reasonableness, and timing.
Run these prompts grounded in AU law
Quillio is built for Australian planning practice — outputs are grounded in state planning legislation, LEC practice, and current authority. See /practice-areas/planning-environmental-lawyers for details, or start a free trial at /free-trial.
These prompts are templates — always verify outputs against source material and current legislation before relying on them in client matters.
Run these prompts on your own matters.
The free trial requires no credit card and no sales call. Sign up, paste any prompt, and see what comes back — grounded in current AU/NZ legal authority with clickable citations.
Start your free trial