Win the panel spot without losing a week to the tender.
I read the tender documents, extract the evaluation criteria, map your firm's capabilities to each criterion, and draft compliant responses — so the tender takes hours, not weeks.
I draft legal panel tender responses by reading the tender documentation, extracting evaluation criteria and mandatory requirements, mapping your firm's capabilities and experience to each criterion, and producing compliant response drafts. I draw on your firm's existing profiles, case studies, and prior tender responses to ensure consistency and avoid starting from scratch every time. Built for Australian government and corporate legal panel tenders.
What changes
A government legal panel tender drops with a 3-week deadline. A partner spends 30+ hours over those weeks drafting responses to 40 evaluation criteria, pulling together team CVs, finding relevant case studies, and formatting the submission. Billable time lost: significant.
I extract the 40 evaluation criteria, map your existing profiles and case studies to each, and draft compliant responses. The partner reviews, refines, and adds strategic positioning — 8 hours instead of 30.
From upload to output
Upload the tender documents
Upload the RFT, evaluation criteria, and any attachments. I extract the mandatory requirements, evaluation criteria, word limits, and formatting requirements.
I map your firm's capabilities
Drawing on your firm profiles, team CVs, case studies, and prior tender responses, I map your capabilities to each evaluation criterion and identify gaps.
Get the draft responses
A complete draft submission: each criterion addressed within word limits, mandatory requirements checked, case studies and team profiles incorporated, and gaps flagged for partner input.
Review, refine, and submit
The partner reviews each response, adds strategic positioning and relationship context that only they know, and the final submission is formatted for lodgement.
What you can do with Quillio tender response drafting
- Extract evaluation criteria and mandatory requirements from tender documents
- Map firm capabilities to each criterion automatically
- Draft compliant responses within specified word limits
- Incorporate relevant case studies and team profiles
- Check mandatory requirement compliance before submission
- Reuse and adapt content from prior tender responses
- Flag gaps where the firm needs to address a weakness
- Format the submission to the tender's specified requirements
A real example
A state government department issues an RFT for a 3-year legal services panel across 6 practice areas. The evaluation criteria include 40 questions with word limits, plus mandatory requirements for insurance, conflict policies, and diversity commitments.
Upload the RFT and evaluation criteria. Quillio already has access to your firm profiles, team CVs, and 3 prior tender submissions from the last 2 years.
A complete draft submission: 40 evaluation criteria responses (all within word limits), mandatory requirement compliance checklist (2 items flagged for partner confirmation — insurance certificate needs updating and one diversity metric needs current data), 12 case studies mapped to relevant criteria, and 8 team profiles selected for the nominated practice areas. The partner reviews and refines in 8 hours instead of starting from a blank page.
Documents, jurisdictions, and practice areas
Document types
- Request for tender (RFT) documents
- Evaluation criteria schedules
- Firm capability statements
- Team CVs and profiles
- Case study summaries
- Prior tender submissions
- Panel arrangement contracts
- Deed of standing offer templates
Jurisdictions
- NSW
- VIC
- QLD
- WA
- SA
- TAS
- ACT
- NT
- Federal
Practice areas
- All practice areas
Tender Response Drafting FAQs
Does it handle government-specific tender formats?
Yes. Australian government tenders (Commonwealth, state, and local) follow specific formats and evaluation frameworks. I understand the structure of AusTender, state procurement portals, and the evaluation methodologies commonly used — including value-for-money assessments, capability-based scoring, and mandatory requirement gating.
Can it reuse content from prior tenders?
Yes — and this is where the biggest time saving comes from. I index your prior tender responses and reuse relevant content, adapting it to the new criteria and word limits. Firms that have submitted 3+ tenders in the past 2 years see the biggest efficiency gains.
How does it handle confidential client information in case studies?
Case studies are drawn from your firm's existing approved case study library. I do not create case studies from confidential matter files. If you need a new case study for a criterion, I flag it and you create the approved version.
Does it replace the BD team?
No. I handle the structured drafting work — extracting criteria, mapping capabilities, drafting compliant responses. The BD team and partners add the strategic positioning, the relationship context, and the judgment on how to present the firm's strengths. The combination is faster and better than either alone.
Try it on a current document.
Upload a current tender and see the draft responses in hours. Free trial, no credit card, no sales call.
Start your free trial