Home / Workflows / Pursuing a vendor warranty claim post-completion
Australia (Federal) · Commercial Law

Pursuing a vendor warranty claim post-completion

Warranty claims are contractual and governed by the notice, time limit, and liability cap provisions in the SPA. Claims must be particularised correctly to preserve rights and avoid the knowledge-based defences typically baked into the contract.

In short

This is an 8-step workflow for bringing a warranty claim under a share or business sale agreement after completion, including notice obligations and quantum preparation.

Time: 20-80 hours depending on scale of the breach and whether proceedings are issued.
Audience: Commercial lawyers acting for a buyer that has discovered a breach of warranty post-completion.
Run this workflow with Quillio — free trial
Prerequisites

Before you start

  • Executed share purchase or business sale agreement
  • Completion accounts and completion statement
  • Disclosure letter delivered before completion
  • Evidence of the breach discovered post-completion
8 steps

The workflow

1

Review the warranty and limitation clauses

Map the relevant warranties, the notice provisions (time limits, content requirements), the de minimis / basket thresholds, and the liability cap.

Tools: Quillio
2

Analyse the disclosure letter

Check whether the matter was fairly and specifically disclosed. General disclosure of data room contents is often insufficient — look for specific disclosure.

Tools: Quillio
3

Quantify the loss

Quantify loss on the measure set out in the SPA — typically diminution in value or a damages measure. Engage a forensic accountant early where loss is complex.

4

Consider tax gross-up and insurance

Check tax gross-up clauses and whether warranty & indemnity insurance responds. Notify the W&I insurer within the policy timeframes — often 30 days.

5

Draft and serve the warranty notice

Serve a notice strictly in accordance with the SPA — reasonable detail of facts, grounds, and (where required) quantum. Errors in notice content often defeat claims.

Tools: Quillio
Ipsos v Dentsu Aegis Network [2015] EWHC 1726
6

Engage in pre-action correspondence

Many SPAs require a good-faith attempt to resolve claims before proceedings. Prepare a pre-action protocol letter and without-prejudice settlement proposal.

Tools: Quillio
7

Consider alternative causes of action

Assess parallel causes — misleading or deceptive conduct under s 18 Australian Consumer Law, and common law fraud where warranties were given knowing they were false.

Tools: Quillio
Australian Consumer Law (Sch 2 CCA 2010 (Cth)) s 18
8

Issue and manage proceedings

If unresolved, issue proceedings in the Federal Court or relevant state Supreme Court. Retain escrow, set-off, and specific performance claims as strategic options.

Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth)
Outcome

What you will have at the end

Either a negotiated settlement paid out of the escrow account or via direct payment, or a judgment for damages for breach of warranty.

Common issues

  • Notice served late or with insufficient detail, defeating the claim
  • Fairly disclosed matters that reduce the claim or remove it entirely
  • Quantum measured on the wrong basis (cost of cure vs diminution in value)
  • W&I insurance notification missed, excluding cover
  • Over-reliance on warranty claim where s 18 ACL is the stronger pathway
Use with Quillio

Run this workflow on a real matter

Quillio drafts SPA warranty notices to the specificity required by the agreement and cross-checks against disclosure letter content. See /practice-areas/commercial-lawyers.

This workflow is a general guide. Warranty regimes are bespoke to each transaction — the SPA drafting controls the outcome.

Try this workflow with Quillio.

Quillio can run this workflow on a real matter, with citations to current AU authority on every step. The free trial requires no credit card.

Start your free trial