Defending a drug possession or supply charge in NSW
Drug offences in NSW are prosecuted under the Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (DMTA). Penalties vary significantly based on the type and quantity of drug involved. Possession of a small quantity may attract a fine or diversion, while supply of a commercial quantity carries a maximum of life imprisonment. The deemed supply provisions in s 29 reverse the onus of proof once a trafficable quantity is established.
This is an 8-step workflow for defending drug possession, deemed supply, and supply charges under the Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW). It covers evidence analysis, search warrant challenges, and available defences and diversions.
Before you start
- A copy of the Court Attendance Notice identifying the specific drug offence
- Client instructions on the circumstances of the arrest and search
- The prosecution brief including forensic analysis certificate, search warrant (if applicable), and police statements
- The client's criminal history
The workflow
Classify the offence and quantity
Identify the specific offence charged (possession s 10, deemed supply s 29, supply s 25, or manufacture/cultivation). Determine the drug type and quantity, and check whether the quantity falls within the small, trafficable, indictable, commercial, or large commercial thresholds in Schedule 1.
Challenge the search and seizure
Review the legality of the search that led to the drug being found. Check whether a search warrant was issued and complied with, whether a warrantless search was lawful under LEPRA Part 4, and whether the accused's rights (including the right to silence) were observed during the search.
Analyse the forensic certificate
Review the forensic drug analysis certificate. Confirm the substance was correctly identified, the weight and purity are accurately stated, and the chain of custody from seizure to analysis is unbroken. Challenge any deficiencies.
Assess the evidence of possession or supply
For possession, consider whether the prosecution can prove knowledge and control. For deemed supply, assess whether the accused can rebut the presumption under s 29 by showing the drugs were for personal use. For supply, analyse the evidence of actual supply or intent.
Identify available defences
Consider defences including lack of knowledge, lack of possession (drugs belonged to another person), duress, entrapment (noting this is not a complete defence in NSW but may affect sentencing), and exclusion of illegally or improperly obtained evidence under s 138 of the Evidence Act.
Explore diversion options
For personal use quantities, assess eligibility for the Cannabis Cautioning Scheme, the Magistrates Early Referral Into Treatment (MERIT) program, or a s 10 dismissal. For more serious charges, consider whether drug rehabilitation can support a mitigated sentence.
Prepare defence or sentencing submissions
If contesting, prepare submissions challenging the prosecution evidence and presenting the defence case. If entering a plea, draft sentencing submissions addressing the objective seriousness of the offence, the accused's subjective circumstances, and any rehabilitation steps taken.
Appear at hearing and manage bail
Attend the Local or District Court listing. For supply charges, address the show cause requirement for bail. For defended hearings, present the case including any challenges to the search, forensic evidence, and possession or supply elements.
What you will have at the end
An acquittal, a dismissal or diversion for minor offences, exclusion of improperly obtained evidence leading to charge withdrawal, or the most favourable sentence achievable including suspended sentences or intensive correction orders for more serious charges.
Common issues
- Failing to challenge an unlawful search under LEPRA, which could lead to exclusion of the drug evidence
- Not requesting the full forensic analysis report and relying solely on the certificate
- Overlooking the deemed supply presumption and its rebuttal requirements
- Missing diversion opportunities such as MERIT or the Cannabis Cautioning Scheme
- Not addressing the show cause requirement for bail in supply charges early enough
Run this workflow on a real matter
Quillio analyses the prosecution brief, checks drug quantity thresholds against DMTA Schedule 1, identifies search warrant deficiencies, and helps draft submissions challenging the evidence or mitigating sentence. See /practice-areas/criminal-lawyers or start a free trial.
This workflow covers NSW drug offences under the DMTA 1985. Other states have different drug legislation and threshold quantities. Always verify the applicable legislation for your client's jurisdiction.
Try this workflow with Quillio.
Quillio can run this workflow on a real matter, with citations to current AU authority on every step. The free trial requires no credit card.
Start your free trial