Sentencing submissions workflow
Sentencing is structured discretion. The best submissions walk the court through objective seriousness, subjective circumstances, and the applicable statutory purposes in a way that naturally lands on the proposed range. Preparation is half the outcome.
This is an 8-step workflow for preparing written and oral sentencing submissions in Australian criminal courts after a plea of guilty or a finding of guilt. It applies across local, district, and supreme court sentencing.
Before you start
- Plea of guilty entered or verdict of guilty returned
- Statement of facts agreed or narrowed
- Client instructions on personal history, prospects, and remorse
- Criminal history (antecedents) obtained
The workflow
Review the agreed facts
Read the agreed facts against the indictment or court attendance notice. Identify any residual disputes and whether a contested facts hearing is needed before sentence.
Identify objective seriousness factors
Assess where the offending sits on the spectrum for the offence — harm caused, planning, role, vulnerability of victim, breach of trust. This frames the whole submission.
Gather subjective material
Collect character references, psychological or psychiatric reports, rehabilitation certificates, employment letters, and any victim-of-crime history. Brief experts where appropriate.
Apply the sentencing purposes
Work through the statutory purposes — punishment, deterrence, denunciation, rehabilitation, protection of community, recognition of harm — and explain the weighting in this case.
Research comparable sentences
Research recent comparable sentences at appellate and first-instance level. Build a short table of cases with facts, plea, and result to ground the proposed range.
Draft written submissions
Draft written submissions with headings — facts, objective seriousness, subjective case, mitigating factors, proposed orders — and attach the character bundle as an exhibit.
Prepare client for allocutus
Prepare the client for any allocution or reading of a letter of apology. Rehearse demeanour, tone, and what not to say. Confirm the client understands the range.
Present oral submissions at hearing
Present oral submissions, tender the character bundle and any reports, and respond to the bench. Close on the proposed orders and any relevant non-parole period.
What you will have at the end
A coherent written and oral sentencing submission that gives the court a clear, evidence-backed path to the proposed orders.
Common issues
- Character references that read like form letters and carry no weight
- Psychological reports that do not address causation between condition and offending
- Running objective seriousness too low in a way that invites a Crown correction
- Failing to address a statutory aggravating factor head-on
- Not checking for any mandatory minimum or standard non-parole period
Run this workflow on a real matter
Quillio drafts structured sentencing submissions from your facts and subjective bundle, and surfaces recent comparable sentences from appellate databases. See /practice-areas/criminal-lawyers or /free-trial.
General guide only — not legal advice. Sentencing law differs across states and territories; adapt for your jurisdiction and the current legislation.
Try this workflow with Quillio.
Quillio can run this workflow on a real matter, with citations to current AU authority on every step. The free trial requires no credit card.
Start your free trial