Home / Workflows / Property settlement negotiation workflow
AU · Family Law

Property settlement negotiation workflow

Most Australian property settlements resolve by negotiation rather than trial. A disciplined approach — full disclosure, a clean pool, the four-step framework, and a written offer-and-acceptance trail — is the difference between a durable outcome and one that unravels on review.

In short

This is an 8-step workflow for negotiating a property settlement under s 79 of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth). It walks from initial disclosure through to a signed heads of agreement ready for consent orders or a binding financial agreement.

Time: 3 to 12 weeks from disclosure complete to signed heads of agreement, depending on pool complexity and engagement of the other side.
Audience: Australian family lawyers acting for either party in a s 79 property settlement after separation, where proceedings may or may not have been issued.
Run this workflow with Quillio — free trial
Prerequisites

Before you start

  • Signed costs agreement and conflict check complete
  • Client instructions on goals and walk-away position
  • Date of separation and cohabitation agreed or identified as in dispute
  • Pre-action procedure compliance checklist opened
8 steps

The workflow

1

Issue disclosure request and r 6.06 notice

Write to the other side requesting full and frank disclosure under the Family Law Rules 2021 (Cth), including bank statements, payslips, tax returns, super statements, and business records for the last three financial years.

Tools: Quillio, Disclosure checklist
Family Law Rules 2021 (Cth) r 6.06
2

Build the asset and liability pool

Record every asset, liability, and superannuation interest as at a single balance date. Include add-backs for wastage or premature distribution only where the authorities support it.

Tools: Quillio, Spreadsheet
Omacini & Omacini [2005] FamCA 195
3

Apply the four-step framework

Identify the pool, assess contributions (financial, non-financial, homemaker), consider future needs under s 75(2), and test whether the proposed split is just and equitable.

Tools: Quillio
Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) s 79; Stanford v Stanford [2012] HCA 52
4

Obtain valuations on contested assets

Jointly instruct a single expert for real property, businesses, or self-managed super funds. Use the Family Law Rules single expert regime to keep the valuation admissible.

Tools: Valuer panel, Joint letter of instruction
Family Law Rules 2021 (Cth) Part 7.1
5

Draft and send the opening offer

Draft a without prejudice offer setting out the pool, the proposed percentage split, the mechanism (transfer, sale, super split), and a reasonable response time. Mark the letter Calderbank where appropriate.

Tools: Quillio
Calderbank v Calderbank [1976] Fam 93
6

Conduct negotiation or mediation

Negotiate by correspondence, roundtable, or mediation. Keep a clean record of each offer and counter-offer. If mediation is used, ensure the mediator is appropriately qualified.

Tools: Mediation brief, Quillio
Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) s 60I (parenting) / general pre-action
7

Document the heads of agreement

Once in-principle agreement is reached, draft a short heads of agreement recording the pool, the split, the mechanism, tax and duty treatment, and the form the final document will take.

Tools: Quillio
8

Formalise via consent orders or BFA

Convert the heads of agreement into sealed FCFCOA consent orders under s 79 or a binding financial agreement under Part VIIIA, depending on which structure suits the matter.

Tools: FCFCOA Commonwealth Courts Portal, Quillio
Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) ss 79, 90B-90KA
Outcome

What you will have at the end

A negotiated property settlement recorded in a heads of agreement and formalised through sealed FCFCOA consent orders or a binding financial agreement, finalising the parties' property claims against each other.

Common issues

  • Incomplete disclosure from the other side delaying the pool
  • Disputed date of separation affecting post-separation contribution arguments
  • Superannuation splitting procedural fairness missed
  • Parties agreeing to an outcome that does not meet the just and equitable threshold
  • Stamp duty and CGT consequences not factored into the division
Use with Quillio

Run this workflow on a real matter

Quillio builds the pool from raw disclosure, runs the four-step framework against current authority, and drafts without prejudice offer letters in your firm's voice. See /practice-areas/family-lawyers or start a free trial at /free-trial.

General guide only — not legal advice. Adapt for the specific contributions, future needs factors, and tax position of your matter, and confirm current Rules and authorities at the time of use.

Try this workflow with Quillio.

Quillio can run this workflow on a real matter, with citations to current AU authority on every step. The free trial requires no credit card.

Start your free trial