Home / Workflows / Commencing a Federal Court representative (class) action under Part IVA
Australia (Federal) · Litigation

Commencing a Federal Court representative (class) action under Part IVA

Part IVA class actions require seven or more persons with claims against the same person, common issues of law or fact, and claims arising out of the same, similar, or related circumstances. They operate on an opt-out basis with court approval of settlements.

In short

This is an 8-step workflow for commencing a representative proceeding under Part IVA of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), from threshold assessment through to first case management.

Time: 200-800+ hours for initial filing and first case management; multi-year engagements once on foot.
Audience: Plaintiff-side litigation lawyers and class action firms evaluating and running representative proceedings.
Run this workflow with Quillio — free trial
Prerequisites

Before you start

  • Identification of the cause of action and respondent
  • Evidence of at least seven persons with similar claims
  • Common issues of law or fact across the group
  • Funding arrangement (litigation funder, CFO/GCO, or conditional costs)
8 steps

The workflow

1

Confirm Part IVA threshold

Confirm the s 33C threshold criteria — seven or more persons, claims against the same respondent, common issues of law or fact, and claims arising out of same/similar circumstances.

Tools: Quillio
Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 33C
2

Map the group definition

Draft a precise group definition that is ascertainable without individual merits assessment. A loose or merits-based definition risks strike-out.

Tools: Quillio
Multiplex Funds Management Ltd v P Dawson Nominees [2007] FCAFC 200
3

Identify common questions

Articulate the common questions of law or fact that will be determined for the group. The common questions drive case management and settlement distribution.

Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 33C(1)(c)
4

Structure funding and costs

Finalise the funding arrangement — litigation funder agreement, Class Closure/Common Fund Order (CCO/GCO) strategy, or solicitor conditional costs agreement. Address adverse costs.

BMW Australia Ltd v Brewster [2019] HCA 45
5

Draft the originating application and statement of claim

Plead the representative claim with pleaded common issues, group definition, and lead applicant's individual claim. Attach the first schedule of group members where appropriate.

Tools: Quillio
Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth)
6

File and serve

File via the Federal Court portal. Serve the respondent. Publicise the commencement through the firm's website and (for significant matters) media.

Tools: Federal Court portal
Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 9.31
7

Give s 33X opt-out notice

The court will set the opt-out date and approve the form of notice under s 33X. Distribute the notice by the approved means.

Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 33X
8

Attend the first case management conference

At first CMC, the court will address group definition, common questions, evidence plan, and timetable. Anticipate competing class actions and potential stays.

Class Actions Practice Note (GPN-CA)
Outcome

What you will have at the end

A representative proceeding validly commenced and on case management, ready to progress towards mediation, common fund resolution, or trial of common issues.

Common issues

  • Group definitions requiring merits assessment, inviting strike-out
  • Funding arrangements not aligned with the current CCO/GCO framework
  • Lead applicant with a claim atypical of the group
  • Competing class actions creating a carriage dispute
  • Notice of opt-out failing to reach the whole group
Use with Quillio

Run this workflow on a real matter

Quillio drafts Part IVA pleadings with s 33C thresholds mapped, assesses group definitions against recent authority, and benchmarks common fund approaches. See /practice-areas/litigation-lawyers.

This workflow is a general guide. Class action practice is complex and fast-moving — the funding and carriage landscape shifts with each High Court decision.

Try this workflow with Quillio.

Quillio can run this workflow on a real matter, with citations to current AU authority on every step. The free trial requires no credit card.

Start your free trial