Managing a transfer pricing dispute with the ATO
Australia's transfer pricing rules in Division 815 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 require that cross-border dealings between related parties reflect arm's length conditions. When the ATO issues an assessment adjusting transfer pricing, the taxpayer faces significant tax, penalties, and potential double taxation. This workflow covers the dispute process from initial ATO contact through to resolution.
This is an 8-step workflow for managing a transfer pricing dispute with the Australian Taxation Office. Transfer pricing disputes arise when the ATO considers that the pricing of cross-border related-party transactions does not reflect arm's length conditions under Division 815 of the ITAA 1997.
Before you start
- The ATO's position paper, audit findings, or amended assessment
- The taxpayer's existing transfer pricing documentation
- Access to the relevant intercompany agreements and financial data
The workflow
Assess the ATO's position
Review the ATO's audit findings, position paper, or amended assessment in detail. Identify which transactions are in dispute, the ATO's proposed arm's length pricing, and the transfer pricing methodology the ATO has applied. Quantify the tax, penalty, and interest exposure.
Review existing transfer pricing documentation
Assess the adequacy of the taxpayer's existing transfer pricing documentation — local file, master file, and country-by-country report. Identify any gaps that may have contributed to the ATO's position or that expose the taxpayer to penalty uplift for inadequate documentation.
Conduct an independent arm's length analysis
Perform or commission an independent economic analysis of the transactions in dispute. Select the most appropriate transfer pricing method (CUP, resale price, cost plus, TNMM, or profit split) and conduct a benchmarking study using comparable transactions or entities.
Prepare the taxpayer's response or objection
Draft a detailed response to the ATO's position paper or a formal objection to the amended assessment. Address each transaction in dispute, present the taxpayer's arm's length analysis, and explain why the ATO's methodology or comparables are incorrect.
Address penalties and documentation defence
Prepare submissions on penalty remission. If the taxpayer has reasonably arguable position (RAP) documentation, argue for penalty reduction. Address whether the transfer pricing documentation meets the safe harbour requirements to reduce penalties from 50% to 25% (or nil).
Consider a Mutual Agreement Procedure (MAP) request
If the ATO adjustment results in double taxation, assess whether to request a MAP under the relevant Double Tax Agreement. Lodge the MAP request with the ATO's Competent Authority within the treaty time limit (usually 3 years from first notification of the action).
Engage in alternative dispute resolution
Consider the ATO's alternative dispute resolution (ADR) options — early assessment conference, facilitated conference, or independent review. These can resolve disputes faster than litigation and are encouraged by the ATO for transfer pricing matters.
Escalate to AAT or Federal Court if needed
If the objection is disallowed and ADR does not resolve the matter, elect to seek review in the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (merits review) or appeal to the Federal Court (question of law). File within 60 days of the objection decision.
What you will have at the end
A structured approach to the transfer pricing dispute that protects the taxpayer's position, minimises penalties, addresses double taxation risk through MAP, and preserves all escalation rights to the AAT or Federal Court.
Common issues
- Inadequate contemporaneous transfer pricing documentation exposing the taxpayer to penalty uplift
- Using an inappropriate transfer pricing methodology that does not match the transaction type
- Missing the objection deadline for the amended assessment
- Failing to lodge a MAP request within the treaty time limit, losing double taxation relief
- Not engaging economic experts early enough to prepare a credible benchmarking analysis
Run this workflow on a real matter
Quillio helps analyse the ATO's position, research comparable transactions, review transfer pricing documentation for gaps, and draft objection submissions. See /practice-areas/tax-lawyers or start a free trial.
This workflow is a general guide for transfer pricing disputes. These disputes involve complex international tax law, economics, and treaty interpretation. Always engage specialist transfer pricing and legal advisers.
Try this workflow with Quillio.
Quillio can run this workflow on a real matter, with citations to current AU authority on every step. The free trial requires no credit card.
Start your free trial